2014년 8월 24일 일요일

Research


My Topic


Which is more important in travel, quality or quantity?


Source:

Quality in tourism
http://sdt.unwto.org/en/content/quality-tourism


What I hope to learn from this source:


I want to find facts and new sources that will help develop my topic or to get supporting examples of the case that emphasize the importance in tour.


Notes:

  1. While the conventional application of quality management in tourism establishments and services remains the basis, the quality of the natural and cultural environment of tourist destinations adds onto, and these together represent the overall quality of the tourist experience. 
  2. Quality tourism and result in a high level of tourist satisfaction and, at the same time, protect the environment and culture of a destination. 
  3. Improving visitor experience is another key point, with a view to getting visitors to stay longer, travel more widely and spend more. 


Final Thoughts:
This source does not exactly the same with what I want to find. Through this, however, I could know that quality and quantity in tour would affect to more aspects like environment, attractions and so on than I thought, and I should define the meaning of "quality" and "quantity" in my article.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source:
Quality Vs. Quantity In The Big Trip
http://brownvagabonder.com/2013/08/05/quality-vs-quantity/


What I hope to learn from this source:


Through this source I want to know why people should slow down and take a rest in their travel and what would occur in the travel without taking a rest.


Notes: 


Urgent pace cannot last long in the travel. We would not be able to keep up this pace and we would probably end up sacrificing our health and happiness.
The physical, human part of me, needs the rest. It needs to sleep, and eat at regular intervals. It needs to sleep, and eat at regular intervals. It needs the solitude of sitting all day and reading a book, while munching on some apples. It needs the solace of staying put in one place.


Final Thoughts:

This source let me know that the period of travel should be considered before we decide which of quality and quantity is better and just as our mind needs the time of rest, our travel would do so. Besides, I could find statement that can reinforce my point ; if we continue to urge to watch more without any rest, our happiness and health may be sacrificed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source:

Competitive Traveling: Quantity vs. Quality

http://www.dauntlessjaunter.com/2013/09/18/competitive-traveling-quantity-vs-quality/


What I hope to learn from this source:

First of all, I want to resolve this question : What is the meaning of "competitive traveling"? And then want to know the opinion of this blogger about this and supports of his or her


Notes:

  1. One's destination is never a place but rather a new way of looking at things." - Henry Miller 
  2. Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.” – Arthur Ashe 
  3. a person who travels to places for a quick moment is still accomplishing something, still experiencing a new destination, even if it is brief. 
  4. I believe that the best way to educate ourselves, our society, and the people we come into contact with is to travel, but to do it in a way that we are able to soak up the culture, history, art, food, etc. of the places we are traveling to. 
  5. How can we say we’ve been to Amsterdam if KLM (the name of Netherland's airflight) only allowed us a quick layover there while en route to Cairo? 
  6. As long as someone is happy with what they are doing, who’s to say it’s wrong? 

Final Thoughts:

In this source I could find not only my opinion's supports but also the opponent's. Reading the opposite side's supports makes me consider the refutation. Also I learned a word "competitive traveler" that indicates those who aim for visiting as many places as possible and that reflects the today's travel culture, and I think I can paraphrase my topic using this word. And finally this gave the great answer about my topic; it is not a problem what point one thinks important as long as he or she feels happy through it.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source:

The Quality of Travel verses Quantity?

http://travelenlightenment.net/the-quality-of-travel-verses-quantity/#ixzz3H8BtvOEk


What I hope to learn from this source:


I hope I could learn some examples that can support my opinion or what can be helpful in developing my refutation and so forth.


Notes:

  1. Having a local share an orange, or something sweet, or some tea with you because of your time spent with them, sitting with them and not caring about the time spent; whatever the circumstances may be, it’s an experience of quality rather then quantity that provides an inner satisfaction which nobody can take away. 
  2. The moment is what matters. Living in the moment a person will find out that all things take place within that moment. 
  3. If time is limited, the quality of time in any one place will provide a much more satisfying experience then just running from place to place. 
  4. I just met a woman who traveled Israel, Jordan and Egypt and was downhearted because of the rush of time. From my personal experience by visiting with many travelers and tourists, many at the end are mince meet – run into the ground with exhaustion. 
  5. I have met many at the end of their trip who were disappointed, burnt out, toasted, because of the quantity they took on their trip running themselves ragged. 

Final Thoughts:


The author of this post has the same opinion with me. Through this, I could get an example for my opinion. While reading this, I think the researches that are same side with my opinion is almost similar, saying that the deep inspiration and meaningful experiences don't come in short time and the travel without slowing down just makes the traveler exhausted physically and mentally.

2014년 8월 17일 일요일

Research Proposal





<Research Proposal>


-What is my current topic?

My current topic is "Which is more important in travel: Quantity or Quality?" My essay will be about what can be useful in increasing efficiency of tourism (travel) or ways to improve the quality of travel through considering travel elements, especially by comparing merits and demerits of quantity and quality tour.

(In this topic, quality means to stay long time in certain attractions and quantity means to visit as many attractions as one can)


- What are my guiding questions?

  • Why should the quality or quantity be considered in tour?
  • What is the advantage of the tour focused on quality, and what about the tour focused on quantity?
  • How many times people should spend for quality tour?
  • How many places people should visit for quantitative tour?
  • What is the role of the guide of each tour(quantity and quality)?
  • Is there any difference about costs between two types of travel?

- What are my current thoughts?

My opinion is that it is quality that is important in traveling. I would persuade people of that the quality tour is better than quantitative tour with these reasons; the tiredness of quantitative tour, possibility of a deep appreciation, and  freedom from time limitations.



- The tiredness of quantitative tour


: If people visit as many places as they can, it would leads to the tiredness of people. (The more places         people visit, the more tired they would be.) That is, people would be likely to fail in deep appreciation about the tour attractions as time goes by because of lack of the strength.


- The possibility of a deep appreciation


: Just as the saying " You can see as much as you know," the information about the tour place that a person visit would help him or her to understand the place deeply than not knowing anything about it.


- The limitation of time

: If a tour concentrates on the quantity it would make hard to watch or experience the attraction enough because of the time; people should move quickly to visit as many places as they can. This interrupts the deep appreciation of tourists.

- The quality of information
: Tough the advocator of quantitative travel might say that people can get enough information before or after the travel, but it is true that information from media is not always trustworthy and people limited to get information if what they want to know doesn't exist in media.


- What is the opposition?

The opponents might say that it is not common for ordinary people to speak the specific information and deep experiences about tour places in daily life, so it is not necessary to know detailed information about tour places. Also, they can say we can learn about specific information after or before the travel. Moreover, information sometimes can cause the boredom of the tour.


Research Question

*Overall Topic : Tourism

BRAIN STORMING

 - freedom

 - pastime

 - distraction

 - package travel & free travel

 - language

 - popular attraction

 - various fees

 - transportation

 - accommodations



QUESTIONS

- Is this right to restrict the place to travel?

- Is it necessary to learn the language of the country that I am going to visit?

- Which is better; to visit the famous attraction or unknown place on a trip

- Which is better in travel; quantity or quality?

- Should travelers even the natives pay entrance fee?


persuasive essay!!!!


-주장

매체에는 얻을 수 없는 정보나 보다 정확한, 실질적인 정보를 얻을 수 있다.
(Like 이 주위 가게, 더 나은 여행 코스 등에 대한 정보)

더 오랜 시간을 보내기 때문에 그 장소에 대한 애착이 더욱 강해지고 더 많은 것을 알아갈 수 있다.
(특히, 박물관같은 경우 그 안에 있는 전시물을 보는 게 아니라 단순히 유명하다는 이유만으로 그냥 지나치면
그 건물의 가치를 제대로 느꼈다고 할 수 없다.)

단순히 왔다갔다 방문만 하는 여행보다 그 장소의 관광업체에게 이득이 될 수 있다.
(체험 프로그램을 제공하거나 자신의 관광지에 대한 깊은 감명을 남김으로써 더 많은 관람객 유치가 가능하다.)


-반박

비록 짧은 시간에도 감명을 느낄 수 있지만, 보다 진솔적이고 깊은 경험을 누리기는 어려우며, 체력적&정신적인 피로감을 야기한다.

(가난한, 전통 원주민 마을에 방문했다고 가정할 경우, 오랜시간 머무르면 그들과 친해지거나 더욱 생생한 이야기를 들을 수 있지만 그냥 한 번 들렸다 지나치게 되면 그냥 불쌍했다라는 감정밖에는 느끼지 못할 것이다.)

(단순간에 많은 곳을 다닌 만큼 몸은 피곤할 것이고, 많은 것을 보고 느낀 만큼 머리는 복잡해 질것이다.)